Dear Kim Q&A Column Archive
May 2007
ALL GIFTS BIG AND SMALL
Dear Kim:
Our organization is planning a new donor campaign. We are a
crisis center and shelter located in a rural community with a
significant portion of the population being low-income families,
but we also have many recent retirees who have moved here that
are more financially well off. Some of our committee members
would like to establish levels of giving, perhaps with some incentives
attached, and other members feel that this diminishes and may
discourage the contributions of those who may not give large
amounts but are giving more in proportion to their income. What
is the current thinking for such campaigns? Is there a significantly
higher return when using hierarchical "levels," as
opposed to an appeal that stresses that even a $5 or $10 gift
can make a difference?
--Level Playing Field or Ladder of Opportunity?
Dear Level Ladder:
Keep in mind that the main reason someone will support your
organization is that they were asked by someone they knew and
trusted. Big gifts are not going to come from well-designed mail
appeals or an excellent website (although I am favor of both
and they help). Bigger gifts are going to come from personal
face-to-face asking.
However, having said that, let's look at incentives. Many fundraisers
(and I would be in this camp) advise small groups against having
very many incentives for the simple reason that they are too
much work for you. We have a saying in fundraising, "Never
promise on the front end what you can't deliver on the back end." When
you promise someone something for their gift, you have to deliver
it. Also, if the audience you are most interested in reaching
is retired people who are well off, what are you going to offer
them that they don't already have, or that they didn't get rid
of before moving to your community?
So you are looking for incentives that encourage everyone to
give what they can and to feel good about their gifts. To do
that, work with incentives that aren't related to the size of
the gift, but the timing of the gift, which makes everything
equal. Matching challenges are great for this: "Every gift
received before June 10th will be matched one to one. Every dollar
is two dollars!" Or use an incentive of getting to know
the donors, "If we receive your gift by June 15th, we will
send you two free tickets to our Summer Auction." You may
be thinking, "But we need the money from the ticket sales." However,
many people won't use the free tickets, and those that do might
not have bought tickets. You will have a chance to meet some
new donors, a decent number who are retired and wanting to get
involved in the community.
You can also suggest different sizes of gifts by talking about
what you need, for example:
* Your gift of $5 buys a stuffed animal to give to a homeless
child. At any given time, we have 15 children staying at our
shelter. Your gift of $75 would buy a stuffed animal for all
of them.
* Your gift of $50 provides three lessons in interviewing techniques
for people who have been out of the workforce for some time.
85% of our clients got jobs after receiving lessons in interviewing
techniques, and 75% still had their job two years later.
* 25 residents need lessons each month. Your gift of $100 provides
lessons for two residents. Your gift of $500 provides lessons
for ten residents. Your gift of $1,250 provides lessons for every
resident for one month.
And so on.... People do tend to love to know what their money
might do, and this allows you the chance to educate donors about
some of your programs.
Incentives can also be value driven, for example:
"Your gift helps. No gift is too big or too small because
every gift is put right to work helping a family in crisis."
You can see that there are a lot of ways to suggest amounts
without putting down small amounts and yet encouraging people
who can to make big gifts.
Good luck!
--Kim Klein
|